Accountability
A named person remains answerable for the use case and its outcomes.
Knowledge area
How do we keep AI lawful, safe, accountable and fit for purpose?
The management system around AI: decision rights, policies, controls and evidence spanning discovery, procurement, development, deployment, operation and retirement.
Operating principles
A named person remains answerable for the use case and its outcomes.
Controls increase with potential harm, autonomy, scale and uncertainty.
Approval is a continuing obligation, not a one-time gate.
Claims about value, safety and compliance are supported by reviewable evidence.
Put it into practice
Define policy, scope, committees, delegated authority and interfaces with existing governance.
Record purpose, owners, users, data, suppliers, models, dependencies and affected groups.
Require evidence at concept, design, validation, deployment, material change and retirement.
Time-limit exceptions, document residual risk and name the authority accepting it.
Minimum evidence set
Move from knowledge to practice
Connect accountability, evidence and oversight to the way AI is actually delivered and used.
Start a conversation ↗